[PATCH] Btrfs: fix transaction leak during fsync call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If btrfs_log_dentry_safe() returns an error, we set ret to 1 and
fall through with the goal of committing the transaction. However,
in the case where the inode doesn't need a full sync, we would call
btrfs_wait_ordered_range() against the target range for our inode,
and if it returned an error, we would return without commiting or
ending the transaction, leaving the transaction open forever.

Since when btrfs_wait_ordered_range() doesn't return an error we
commit the transaction, it doesn't make sense to make a call to
btrfs_wait_ordered_range() because committing the transaction will
wait for all ordered extents to complete anyway.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/file.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 8accf94..e0be468 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -2022,12 +2022,6 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
 				goto out;
 			}
 		}
-		if (!full_sync) {
-			ret = btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, start,
-						       end - start + 1);
-			if (ret)
-				goto out;
-		}
 		ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans, root);
 	} else {
 		ret = btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux