On Fri, 23 May 2014 05:05:30 +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
> So that the same check (btrfs cloner program presence) can be reused
> by other tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> common/rc | 7 +++++++
> tests/btrfs/035 | 4 +---
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index d1788d1..f27ee53 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -2085,6 +2085,13 @@ _require_fssum()
> [ -x $FSSUM_PROG ] || _notrun "fssum not built"
> }
>
> +_require_btrfs_cloner()
> +{
> + CLONER_PROG=$here/src/cloner
> + [ -x $CLONER_PROG ] || \
> + _notrun "cloner binary not present at $CLONER_PROG"
> +}
Would prefer to avoid the reliance on $here, but it appears that other
common/rc functions make the same assumption.
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>
Cheers, David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
