Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: save us an unnecessary ioctl call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:05:05PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
> Btrfs device id start from 1, not 0.

> --- a/utils.c
> +++ b/utils.c
> @@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ int get_fs_info(char *path, struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args *fi_args,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	for (; i <= fi_args->max_id; ++i) {
> +	for (i = 1; i <= fi_args->max_id; ++i) {

You're right about the device id start, but forcing 1 here breaks the
case when get_fs_info is called with block device as an argument and 'i'
is set to the devid a few lines above.

Initializing i to 1 in the declaration block is the right fix IMO, and
as this is a trivial change I'll do that myself, no need to resend.

>  		BUG_ON(ndevs >= fi_args->num_devices);
>  		ret = get_device_info(fd, i, &di_args[ndevs]);
>  		if (ret == -ENODEV)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux