The term has not seen an agreement and we don't want to change it once it's in non-development branches or even released. Discussion under the patch: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/34627 Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> --- Some variant based on of the terms: occupy, hold, retain, maintain cmds-fi-disk_usage.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/cmds-fi-disk_usage.c b/cmds-fi-disk_usage.c index 5580134ac939..453410f070da 100644 --- a/cmds-fi-disk_usage.c +++ b/cmds-fi-disk_usage.c @@ -906,7 +906,13 @@ void print_device_sizes(int fd, struct device_info *devinfo, int mode) printf(" Device size: %*s%10s\n", (int)(20 - strlen("Device size")), "", pretty_size_mode(devinfo->device_size, mode)); +#if 0 + /* + * The term has not seen an agreement and we don't want to change it + * once it's in non-development branches or even released. + */ printf(" FS occupied: %*s%10s\n", (int)(20 - strlen("FS occupied")), "", pretty_size_mode(devinfo->size, mode)); +#endif } -- 1.9.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
