On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:38:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > On 04/30/2014 03:37 PM, David Taylor wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Frank Kingswood wrote: > >> On 30/04/14 13:11, David Sterba wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:39:27PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I found a bit unclear the "FS occupied" terms. > >>> > >>> We're running out of terms to describe and distinguish the space that > >>> the filesystem uses. > >>> > >>> 'occupied' seemed like a good choice to me, though it may be not obvious > >> > >> The space that the filesystem uses in total seems to me is called the > >> "size". It has nothing to do with utilization. > >> > >> /dev/sda6, ID: 2 > >> Device size: 10.00GiB > >> Filesystem size: 5.00GiB > > > > FS size was what I was about to suggest, before I saw your reply. > > Pay attention that this value is not the Filesystem size, > but to the maximum space the of THE DEVICE the filesystem is allowed to use. I agree that plain 'Filesystem size' could be misleading, using the same term that has an established meaning can cause misuderstandings in bugreports. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
