On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > [keeping dropped CC although not customary on this list] > > Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2014, 00:42:44 schrieb Duncan: > > >>> > * btrfs filesystem disk_usage - renamed to usage > > >>> > > >>> [On the CLI, "usage" is often used to print a briefer "help", > > >>> and thus shouldn't be used for an actual command.] > > > > > > I think the point was to have the same term for both filesystem and > > > device categories, which IMHO makes a lot of sense and is less to > > > remember. Categorical polymorphism: it's a good thing. :) > > > > Good idea to use the same term. > > > > Bad idea (IMO) to make that term "usage", by itself. > > > > =:^) > > Hmmm, I disagree. What it basically displays is usage. So the term "usage" is > just about right. > > And it isn´t an option either. > > Additionally I never ever used the option "--usage". I didn´t even know it > existed. > > But if you have a different equally short sugestion, I am all ears. > > Anyway, I´d personally wouldn´t block the patch going in due to this. I agree with all your points. For the reference, the term 'usage' has been agreed in the previous iteration. [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg31698.html [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg31694.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
