On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Steve Leung <sjleung@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Once everything gets rebalanced though, I don't think I'd be missing out on any features, would I?
The default nodesize/leafsize is 16KB since btrfs-progs v3.12. This
isn't changed with a balance. The difference between the previous
default 4KB, and 16KB is performance and small file efficiency.
Ah, now it's coming back to me. The last major gyration I had on this
filesystem (and the ultimate trigger for my original issue) was juggling
everything around so that I could reformat for the 16kB node size.
Incidentally, is there a way for someone to tell what the node size
currently is for a btrfs filesystem? I never noticed that info printed
anywhere from any of the btrfs utilities.
In case anyone's wondering, I did balance the system chunks on my
filesystem and "btrfs fi df" now looks normal. So thanks to all for the
hints and advice.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
