Re: safe/necessary to balance system chunks?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/25/2014 11:24 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:

On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Steve Leung <sjleung@xxxxxxx> wrote:

I've got a 3-device RAID1 btrfs filesystem that started out life as single-device.

btrfs fi df:

Data, RAID1: total=1.31TiB, used=1.07TiB
System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=224.00KiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=32.00KiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00
Metadata, RAID1: total=66.00GiB, used=2.97GiB

This still lists some system chunks as DUP, and not as RAID1.  Does this mean that if one device were to fail, some system chunks would be unrecoverable?  How bad would that be?

Anyway, it's probably a high penalty for losing only 32KB of data.  I think this could use some testing to try and reproduce conversions where some amount of "system" or "metadata" type chunks are stuck in DUP. This has come up before on the list but I'm not sure how it's happening, as I've never encountered it.

As for how it occurred, I'm not sure. I created this filesystem some time ago (not sure exactly, but I'm guessing with a 3.4-era kernel?) so it's quite possible it's not reproducible on newer kernels.

It's also nice to know I've been one failed device away from a dead filesystem for a long time now, but better to notice it late than never. :)

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux