On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:59:09PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote: > On 2014/04/16 03:40 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > >So in my example with the automated tool, the tool really shouldn't be > >deleting a snapshot where send is in progress. The tool should be told > >that snapshot is busy and try to delete it again later. > > > >It makes more sense now, 'll queue this up for 3.16 and we can try it out > >in -next. > > > >-chris > So ... does this mean the plan is to a) have userland tool give an error; or > b) a deletion would be "scheduled" in the background for as soon as the send > has completed? b) is current state, a) is the plan with the patch, 'btrfs subvol delete' would return EPERM/EBUSY -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
