Holger Hoffstätte posted on Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:38:45 +0000 as excerpted: > So I'm happily using subvolumes and snapshots and was wondering about > subvolume low-level isolation. Assuming metadata=single, would a corrupt > metadata block in one subvolume's directory tree affect any other > subvolumes on the same physical partition, or would the fallout from > this bad block be contained? This isn't an authoritative answer, but AFAIK, chunks are /not/ subvolume- dedicated. In fact, on the wiki, the sysadmin's guide page defines a snapshot as simply a subvolume that shares its data and metadata with some other subvolume, using btrfs' COW capabilities. Obviously that would be rather difficult if subvolumes get dedicated data and metadata chunks, so... That is in fact why I prefer entirely separate filesystems instead of simply subvolumes, and use separate (but identically sized) filesystems for primary backup as well -- using subvolumes there's only one filesystem superstructure and if it's damaged... Let's just say I'm not comfortable with all my data eggs in the same data basket... the one I might find someday the bottom just dropped out of (particularly since btrfs isn't fully stable yet)! Of course the other benefit to multiple small partitions is that scrubs and balances are that much faster, too! Having a balance or scrub take a minute or five is considerably different than having it take an hour or five! =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
