On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 04/04/2014 09:59 AM, David Sterba wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:53:19PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: >>> >>> This implements the tmpfile callback of struct inode_operations, >>> introduced >>> in the linux kernel 3.11 [1], and implemented already by some >>> filesystems. >> >> >> Nice! >> >> Btw, would be good to mention 'O_TMPFILE' at lest in the changelog. >> >>> Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> >> >> CC: linuxpatches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> how many likes so far? > > > He got a Nice from me ;) That's for when a like alone won't do. > > It doesn't look like xfstests has an O_TMPFILE test? It has now, if you look at Dave's latest xfstests update e-mail he sent earlier today. For reference, I used this for testing: https://friendpaste.com/4n46iUoo4ZdqTAdkPntqYe (plus scrub, send, btrfsck, etc) > > -chris > -- Filipe David Manana, "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
