On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:17:12PM +0000, Martin wrote:
> Thanks for the very good summary.
>
> So... In very brief summary, btrfs raid5 is very much a work in progress.
If you know how to use it, which I didn't know do now, it's technically very
usable as is. The corner cases are in having a failing drive which you can't
hot remove because you can't write to it.
It's unfortunate that you can't just "kill" a drive without umounting,
making the drive disappear so that btrfs can't see it (dmsetup remove
cryptname for me, so it's easy to do remotely), and remounting in degraded
mode.
> Question: Is the raid5 going to be seamlessly part of the
> error-correcting raids whereby raid5, raid6,
> raid-with-n-redundant-drives are all coded as one configurable raid?
I'm not sure I parse your question. As far as btrfs is concerned you can
switch from non raid to raid5 to raid6 by adding a drive and rebalancing
which effectively reads and re-writes all the blocks in the new format.
> Also (second question): What happened to the raid naming scheme that
> better described the btrfs-style of raid by explicitly numbering the
> number of devices used for mirroring, striping, and error-correction?
btrfs fi show kind of tells you that if you know how to read it (I didn't
initially). What's missing for you?
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
