[PATCH 6/6] Btrfs-progs: fsck: fix wrong index in pick_next_pending()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Though all tree blocks have same size, we'd better use right
index here.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 cmds-check.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index 34f8fa6..ebdb643 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -2928,7 +2928,7 @@ static int pick_next_pending(struct cache_tree *pending,
 	cache = search_cache_extent(reada, 0);
 	if (cache) {
 		bits[0].start = cache->start;
-		bits[1].size = cache->size;
+		bits[0].size = cache->size;
 		*reada_bits = 1;
 		return 1;
 	}
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux