On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 08:46:09PM +0000, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:57:41 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> > So right now I'm afraid we don't have a good way for a user to determine
> > whether a device supports queued trims or not.
>
> Mount with discard, unpack kernel tree, sync, rm -rf tree.
> If it takes several seconds, you have sync discard, no?
Mmmh, interesting point.
legolas:/usr/src# time rm -rf linux-3.14-rc5
real 0m1.584s
user 0m0.008s
sys 0m1.524s
I remounted my FS with remount,nodiscard, and the time was the same.
> This changed somewhere around kernel 3.8.x; before that it used to be
> acceptably fast. Since then I only do batch trims, daily (server) or
> weekly (laptop).
I'm never really timed this before. Is it supposed to be faster than 1.5s on
a fast SSD?
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
