On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:49:52AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:25:28PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > This should not be a hard failure, it can continue without RA for this > > buffer. Besides, the RA buffer can be allocated at the beginning of send > > operation and pointer stored in the send context. > > Good point, I think we can fold this into 'struct send_ctx', do you agree? Sure, size of send_ctx + readahead state will remain below 512. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
