[PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fsck: fix wrong return value in check_block()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We found btrfsck will output backrefs mismatch while the filesystem
is defenitely ok.

The problem is that check_block() don't return right value,which
makes btrfsck won't walk all tree blocks thus we don't get a consistent
filesystem, we will fail to check extent refs etc.

Reported-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 cmds-check.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index a2afae6..253569f 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -2477,7 +2477,7 @@ static int check_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	struct cache_extent *cache;
 	struct btrfs_key key;
 	enum btrfs_tree_block_status status;
-	int ret = 1;
+	int ret = 0;
 	int level;
 
 	cache = lookup_cache_extent(extent_cache, buf->start, buf->len);
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux