On 02/13/2014 10:00 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:49:08 +0100 > Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Thanks for the comments, however I don't like du not usage; but you are right >> when you don't like "disk-usage". What about "btrfs filesystem chunk-usage" ? > > Personally I don't see the point of being super-pedantic here, i.e. "look this > is not just filesystem usage, this is filesystem CHUNK usage"... Consistency > of having a matching "dev usage" and "fi usage" would have been nicer. What about "btrfs filesystem chunk-usage" ? -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
