On 02/10/2014 06:06 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Biggest multiplier leads to the pessimistic estimate, which is what
> I'd prefer to see here, so that's good. Agree with this.
I would prefer to use as "raid multiplier" the ratio
total data block groups + total metadata block group
--------------------------------------------------------------
disk space allocated for data and metdata block group
I hope that this would work better when we have a filesystem composed
by small (inlined) files or when we will have per-subvolume RAID levels.
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
