On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:41:23PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > > On 02/10/2014 01:36 PM, cwillu wrote: > >IMO, used should definitely include metadata, especially given that we > >inline small files. > > > >I can convince myself both that this implies that we should roll it > >into b_avail, and that we should go the other way and only report the > >actual used number for metadata as well, so I might just plead > >insanity here. > > > > I could be convinced to do this. So we have > > total: (total disk bytes) / (raid multiplier) > used: (total used in data block groups) + > (total used in metadata block groups) > avail: total - (total used in data block groups + > total metadata block groups) > > That seems like the simplest to code up. Then we can argue about > whether to use the total metadata size or just the used metadata > size for b_avail. Seem reasonable? My vote on that bikeshed: total metadata size. But I'll accept any other answer. :) Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 65E74AC0 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- Well, you don't get to be a kernel hacker simply by looking --- good in Speedos. -- Rusty Russell
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
