On 02/05/2014 11:14 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
Hi Filipe,
So i knew what was wrong here, we need found_key while btrfs_previous_extent_item() did set
it properly..^_^
I will send a v2 to fix this, thanks!
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Since we have introduced btrfs_previous_extent_item() to search previous
extent item, just switch into it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Shilong,
This patch is making btrfs/004 fail for me, consistently:
I was trying to reproduce this xfstest failure(though we have known what's wrong with my previous patch).
I did not really hit 004 failure, but i can reproduce btrfs/030 fail consistently, i think you might be interested in this:
Do you guys have some CONFIG_ONLY_BREAK_FOR_ME=y set or something? I
can't reproduce this failure either. Will you send the updated
btrfs_previous_extent_item patch and then see if you can bisect down why
030 is failing for you? Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
