[PATCH RFC 2/5] btrfs: search_ioctl rejects unused setted values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



To prevent unexpectet values in the unused fields of the search key fail early.
Otherwise future extensions would break the behavior of the search if current
implementations in userspace set them to values other than zero.

Signed-off-by: Gerhard Heift <Gerhard@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index be4c780..919d928 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -1947,6 +1947,9 @@ static noinline int search_ioctl(struct inode *inode,
 	if (buf_size < sizeof(struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header))
 		return -EOVERFLOW;
 
+	if (sk->unused || sk->unused1 | sk->unused2 | sk->unused3 | sk->unused4)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
 	if (!path)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
1.8.5.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux