On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 08:29:22PM +0100, Gerhard Heift wrote:
> I have already patches for such an ioctl. Which form do you prefer?
Great!
> struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args_inline {
> struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key key;
> __u64 buf_len
> char buf[0];
> };
This one.
> char __user *buf;
We want to avoid dereferencing any user pointers in kernel, the whole
structure is one blob.
> And against which commit should I rebase them?
The kernel patches against btrfs-next, progs patches against any recent
integration branch.
david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
