On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 17:47 +0000, Martin wrote: > There's the very good idea of releasing the btrfs userspace tools with a > version number that matches the kernel version... Good to see a good > jump for what is considered 'stable'. > > > What is the policy for maintaining compatibility with whatever range of > kernel versions? > > And what is the state of play now for the "Chris Mason" or whatever > latest 'stable' branch of btrfs on git? > > > In other words: Should we always update the btrfs userspace tools to the > latest even though we may be running one or two kernels behind that?... In a recent thread on this mailing list: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31536 it looks like the decision made was that the latest btrfs-progs should support older kernels. -- Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
