Re: [bug] its messy when missing device reappears after its been replaced in RAID1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Anand,

It seems that other developers did not notice such an important thread.:-)
I gave some of my opinions about this issue.

See more below.....

On 01/07/2014 12:56 AM, Anand Jain wrote:

test case:
[snip]
....
----------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 2ca91fc..b226284 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -496,14 +496,39 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char *path,

                device->fs_devices = fs_devices;
        } else if (!device->name || strcmp(device->name->str, path)) {
-               name = rcu_string_strdup(path, GFP_NOFS);
-               if (!name)
-                       return -ENOMEM;
-               rcu_string_free(device->name);
-               rcu_assign_pointer(device->name, name);
-               if (device->missing) {
-                       fs_devices->missing_devices--;
-                       device->missing = 0;
+
+               struct buffer_head *bh;
+               struct btrfs_super_block *cur_disk_super;
+               u64 cur_transid;
+
+               if (!device->missing) {
+                       bh = btrfs_read_dev_super(device->bdev);
+                       if (!bh)
+                               return -EINVAL;
+
+                       cur_disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)
+                        bh->b_data;
+                       cur_transid = btrfs_super_generation(ds);
+               } else
+                       cur_transid = 0;
+
+               if (found_transid > cur_transid) {

I agree we use transid to find most proper device, but this check is not right. Here @found_transid is the most biggest generation, so a right candidate device's transid should be @found_tranid -1 (power off for example)or same as @found_transid.

Anyway, i think the right way should be to check two same id device, and we only replace
existed one if new found one's transid > previous one.

Please correct me if i miss something here.^_^

Thanks,
Wang
+
+                       name = rcu_string_strdup(path, GFP_NOFS);
+                       if (!name)
+                               return -ENOMEM;
+
+                       rcu_string_free(device->name);
+                       rcu_assign_pointer(device->name, name);
+
+                       if (device->missing) {
+                               fs_devices->missing_devices--;
+                               device->missing = 0;
+                       }
+
+       printk_in_rcu(KERN_INFO "%s tran %llu replaced %s tran %llu\n",
+                               path, found_transid,
+                               rcu_str_deref(device->name), tranid);
                }
        }

---------------------------------------


Thanks Anand


[1] github.com/anajain/devmgt.git



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux