Re: Problems with incremental send/receive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Felix,

On 01/10/2014 03:26 PM, Felix Blanke wrote:
Hi Wang,

here are the versioninformation:

server log # btrfs version
Btrfs v3.12-dirty
server log # uname -a
Linux server.home 3.12.6-hardened-r3 #1 SMP Thu Jan 2 13:16:48 CET
2014 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1610 @ 2.60GHz GenuineIntel
GNU/Linux

This should work if I understood you correct?I try your below scripts,

Did you use other subvolume for mounting? If yes, try to remounting
your btrfs filesystem with fs tree(root id=5), and rerun.

Some people reported the same issue for btrfs send/receive recently.
I fixed the problem in send[1], but we can still encounter the same issue in
receive[2]

Hopely, my answer is helpful to you.^_^

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3258971/
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3369111/

Thanks,
Wang

Regards,
Felix

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Felix Blanke <felixblanke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Wang,

thank you for your answer.

I am using the latest btrfs-progs with the 3.12 kernel. I don't have
access to the machine right now (it looks like it crashed :/) but I
can send the exact versions when I'm home.

Regards,
Felix

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Felix,

It seems some reported this problem before. The problem for your below case
is because you use latest btrfs-progs(v3.12?), which will need kernel
update,
kernel 3.12 is ok.

However, i think btrfs-progs should keep compatibility, i will send a patch
to
make things more friendly.

Thanks,
Wang

On 01/09/2014 06:04 AM, Felix Blanke wrote:
Hi List,

My backup stopped working and I can't figure out why. I'm using
send/receive with the "-p" switch for incremental backups using the
last snapshot as a parent snapshot for sending only the changed data.

The problem occurs using my own backup script. After I discovered the
problem I did a quick test using the exact commands from the wiki with
the same result: It doesn't work. Here is the output:


server ~ # ./test_snapshot.sh
++ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/root1/@root_home/
/mnt/root1/snapshots/test
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/root1/@root_home/' in
'/mnt/root1/snapshots/test'
++ sync
++ btrfs send /mnt/root1/snapshots/test
++ btrfs receive /mnt/backup1/
At subvol /mnt/root1/snapshots/test
At subvol test
++ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/root1/@root_home/
/mnt/root1/snapshots/test_new
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/root1/@root_home/' in
'/mnt/root1/snapshots/test_new'
++ sync
++ btrfs send -p /mnt/root1/snapshots/test /mnt/root1/snapshots/test_new
++ btrfs receive /mnt/backup1/
At subvol /mnt/root1/snapshots/test_new
At snapshot test_new
ERROR: open @/test failed. No such file or directory

I don't get where the "@/" in front of the snapshot name comes from.
It could be that I had a subvolume named @, but this doesn't exists
anymore and I don't understand why this would be important for the
send/receive.

Some more details about the fs:

server ~ # btrfs subvol list /mnt/root1/
ID 259 gen 568053 top level 5 path @root
ID 261 gen 568053 top level 5 path @var
ID 263 gen 568049 top level 5 path @home
ID 302 gen 568053 top level 5 path @owncloud_chroot
ID 421 gen 568038 top level 5 path @root_home
ID 30560 gen 563661 top level 5 path snapshots/home_2014-01-06-19:33_d
ID 30561 gen 563665 top level 5 path
snapshots/owncloud_chroot_2014-01-06-19:34_d
ID 30562 gen 563674 top level 5 path
snapshots/root_home_2014-01-06-19:38_d
ID 30563 gen 563675 top level 5 path snapshots/var_2014-01-06-19:39_d
ID 30564 gen 563697 top level 5 path snapshots/root_2014-01-06-19:50_d

server ~ # btrfs subvol get-default /mnt/root1/
ID 5 (FS_TREE)

server ~ # ls -l /mnt/root1/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  30 May 10  2013 @home
drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 134 Jan  5 19:27 @owncloud_chroot
drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 204 Nov 24 18:16 @root
drwx------. 1 root root 468 Jan  8 22:47 @root_home
drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 114 Oct  7 17:39 @var
drwx------. 1 root root 420 Jan  8 22:50 snapshots


Any ideas? Thanks in advance.


Regards,
Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message tomajordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info athttp://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux