Re: How does btrfs handle bad blocks in raid1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duncan,

As a silent reader of this list (for almost a year)...
As an anonymous supporter of the BAARF (Battle Against Any RAID
Four/Five/Six/ Z etc...) initiative...

I can only break my silence and applaud your frequent interventions
referring to N-Way mirroring (searching the list for the string
"n-way" brings up almost exclusively your posts, at least in recent
times).

Because that's what I' m also eager to see implemented in BTRFS and
somehow felt disappointed that it wasn't given priority over the
parity solutions...

I currently use ZFS on Linux in a 4-disk RAID10 (performing pretty
good by the way) being stuck with the 3.11 kernel because of DKMS
issues and not being able to share by SMB or NFS because of some bugs.

I'm really looking forward to the day that typing:

mkfs.btrfs -d raid10 -m raid10  /dev/sd[abcd]

will do exactly what is expected to do. A true RAID10 resilient in 2
disks' failure. Simple and beautiful.

We're almost there...

Best regards to all BTRFS developers/contributors
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux