Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



joystick wrote:

> On 06/01/2014 14:11, Alex Elsayed wrote:
>> joystick wrote:
>>
>>> Just by looking at the Subjects, it seems patch number 0/1 is missing.
>>> It might have not gotten through to the lists, or be a numbering
>>> mistake.
>> No, the numbering style is ${index}/${total}, where index = 0 is a cover
>> letter. So there are two patches total, 1/2 and 2/2, with the cover
>> letter 0/2.
> 
> Ok sorry, I meant
> 
> "Just by looking at the Subjects, it seems patch number 1/2 is missing."
> 
> and not 0/1
> 
> Can you see the 1/2 on the lists? I can't.

Oh, I see. No, it looks fine from here - I'm reading via Gmane's NNTP 
gateway, and 1/2 has

Message-ID: <1389000716-3274-2-git-send-email-amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux