On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 06:18:53PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> * fsck is skipped for filesystems where the relevant helper does not
> exist, so fs_passno=1 has the same effect for xfs and btrfs
> filesystems (either way, nothing happens).
>
> That still leaves non-systemd systems and calling "fsck -A" manually.
> Maybe a good solution would be to patch fsck to adopt systemd's
> behavior, which would avoid every filesystem having to ship these
> "fake" fsck helpers? What do you think Karel?
It's already implemented for years, "fsck -A" ignores filesystems
without fsck.<type> helpers. It only complains if you explicitly
specify the device on command line (e.g. fsck /dev/sdb1).
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
