Hello, > distribution, used space on each device should be accordingly: 160, > 216, and 405. The last number should be 376, I copied the wrong one. Anyway, I deleted as much data as possible, which probably won't help in the end, but at the moment it's still going. Meanwhile, I made a script to replicate this problem: http://pastebin.com/W2c2pJYp On kernel 3.12.6 the output is: ------- WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using adding device /dev/loop1 id 2 fs created label (null) on /dev/loop0 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 40.00GB Btrfs v0.20-rc1 17000+0 records in 17000+0 records out 17825792000 bytes (18 GB) copied, 533,571 s, 33,4 MB/s Label: none uuid: f8a01060-94c2-4665-b5ff-f134f9b6ad9b Total devices 2 FS bytes used 16.63GB devid 2 size 20.00GB used 18.01GB path /dev/loop1 devid 1 size 20.00GB used 18.03GB path /dev/loop0 Btrfs v0.20-rc1 ERROR: error removing the device 'missing' - No space left on device Label: none uuid: f8a01060-94c2-4665-b5ff-f134f9b6ad9b Total devices 4 FS bytes used 16.62GB devid 4 size 10.00GB used 9.03GB path /dev/loop3 devid 3 size 10.00GB used 9.25GB path /dev/loop2 devid 1 size 20.00GB used 12.31GB path /dev/loop0 *** Some devices missing Btrfs v0.20-rc1 ------- The "delete missing" logic is pretty much broken, at least in this case. Instead of just replicating the data to other drives, it moves some of the data which fills up smaller drives and it fails with "No space left on device" error. Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
