Re: btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Mason posted on Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:51:23 +0000 as excerpted:

> It'll pick the latest generation number and use that one as the one true
> source.  For the others you'll get crc errors which make it fall back to
> the latest one.  If the two have exactly the same generation number,
> we'll have a hard time picking the best one.
> 
> Ilya has a series of changes from this year's GSOC that we need to clean
> up and integrate.  It detects offline devices and brings them up to date
> automatically.
> 
> He targeted the pull-one-drive use case explicitly.

Thanks for the explanation and bits to look forward to.

I'll be looking forward to seeing that GSOC stuff then, as having 
dropouts and re-adds auto-handled would be a sweet feature to add to the 
raid featureset, improving things from a sysadmin's prepared-to-deal-with-
recovery perspective quite a bit. =:^)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux