Re: btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 22:28 +-1100, Chris Samuel wrote:
+AD4- On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 12:57:02 AM Dave wrote:
+AD4- 
+AD4- +AD4- I find myself annoyed by the constant disclaimers I
+AD4- +AD4- read on this list, about the experimental status of Btrfs, but it's
+AD4- +AD4- apparent that this hasn't sunk in for everyone.
+AD4- 
+AD4- Btrfs will no longer marked as experimental in the kernel as of 3.13.
+AD4- 
+AD4- Unless someone submits a patch to fix it first. :-)
+AD4- 
+AD4- Can we also keep things polite here please.

Seconded +ADs-)  We're really focused on nailing down these problems instead
of hiding behind the experimental flag.  I know we won't be perfect
overnight, but it's time to focus on production workloads.

-chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux