Re: btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 06:10:14 AM Duncan wrote:

> Btrfs remains under development and there are clear warnings
> about using it without  backups one hasn't tested recovery from
> or are not otherwise prepared to  actually use.  It's stated in
> multiple locations on the wiki; it's stated on the kernel btrfs
> config option, and it's stated in mkfs.btrfs output when you
> create the filesystem.

Actually the scary warnings are gone from the Kconfig file for what will be the 
3.13 kernel.  Removed by this commit:

commit 4204617d142c0887e45fda2562cb5c58097b918e
Author: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Nov 20 14:32:34 2013 +0100

    btrfs: update kconfig help text
    
    Reflect the current status. Portions of the text taken from the
    wiki pages.
    
    Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


-- 
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC

This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux