Re: btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 3, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Jim Salter <jim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I actually read the wiki pretty obsessively before blasting the list - could not successfully find anything answering the question, by scanning the FAQ or by Googling.
> 
> You're right - mount -t btrfs -o degraded /dev/vdb /test worked fine.
> 
> HOWEVER - this won't allow a root filesystem to mount. How do you deal with this if you'd set up a btrfs-raid1 or btrfs-raid10 as your root filesystem? 

I'd say that it's not ready for unattended/auto degraded mounting, that this is intended to be a red flag show stopper to get the attention of the user. Before automatic degraded mounts, which md and LVM raid do now, there probably needs to be notification support in desktop's, .e.g. Gnome will report degraded state for at least md arrays (maybe LVM too, not sure). There's also a list of other multiple device stuff on the to do, some of which maybe should be done before auto degraded mount, for example the hot spare work.

https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#Multiple_Devices


Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux