On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> [commit 8185554d: fix incorrect inode acl reset] introduced a dead > >> code by adding a condition which can never be true to an else > >> branch. The condition can never be true because it is already > >> checked by a previous if statement which causes function to return. > > On Wed, Jan 01 2014, Filipe David Manana wrote: > > Josef already added this patch to btrfs-next weeks ago: > > > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git/commit/?id=c4a886e433dce2b902324a54ef2d13691a760312 > > Ah, sorry for the spam then. > > The original thread did not mention it and this commit was not included > in linux-next's master branch. FYI, the patches get merged to btrfs-next without confirmations to the mailiglist, the linux-next tree does not merge the development branches, only when Chris publishes a branch named 'next'. (http://linux.f-seidel.de/linux-next/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Linux-next.IncludedTrees) david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
