[commit 8185554d: fix incorrect inode acl reset] introduced a dead
code by adding a condition which can never be true to an else
branch. The condition can never be true because it is already
checked by a previous if statement which causes function to return.
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-By: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/acl.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/acl.c b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
index 0890c83..460f36b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/acl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
@@ -225,13 +225,8 @@ int btrfs_init_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
ret = posix_acl_create(&acl, GFP_NOFS, &inode->i_mode);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
-
- if (ret > 0) {
- /* we need an acl */
+ if (ret > 0) /* we need an acl */
ret = btrfs_set_acl(trans, inode, acl, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS);
- } else if (ret < 0) {
- cache_no_acl(inode);
- }
} else {
cache_no_acl(inode);
}
--
1.8.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
