Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:22:55AM +0100, Kai Krakow wrote: >> These thought are actually quite interesting. So you are saying that data >> may not be fully written to SSD although the kernel thinks so? This is > > That, and worse. > > Incidently, I have just posted on my G+ about this: > https://plus.google.com/106981743284611658289/posts/Us8yjK9SPs6 > > which is mostly links to > http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html > https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast13/understanding-robustness-ssds-under-power-fault > > After you read those, you'll never think twice about SSDs and data loss > anymore :-/ > (I kind of found that out myself over time too, but these have much more > data than I got myself empirically on a couple of SSDs) The bad thing here is: Even battery-backed RAID controllers won't help you here. I start to understand why I still don't trust this new technology entirely. Thanks, Kai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
