Re: Is anyone using btrfs send/receive for backups instead of rsync?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:48:10AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> 
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > If one day, it could at least work on a subvolume level (only sync a
> > subvolume), then it would be more useful to me. Maybe later…
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something, but btrfs send/receive only work on a subvolume level.

Never mind, I seem to be the one being dense. I mis-read that you needed
to create the filesystem with btrfs receive.
Indeed, it's on a subvolume level, so it's actually fine since it does
allow over provisionning afterall.

My bad, sorry :)

Marc
-- 
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/                         | PGP 1024R/763BE901
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux