On Dec 28, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Emil Karlson <jekarlson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In my case, I'm unable to reproduce the problem. I get the same sha256sum of an existing 16M journal file (in the read only snapshot) as I do in the send/received snapshot. The difference is the original is compromised of 1976 extents, while the received is in a single extent. > > Was the send incremental? Oops no, and I bet that's the difference. So you are doing an incremental send/receive using -p? I've only done incremental snapshots with send -p while also using -f to write to a file; not through btrfs receive. Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
