Re: Is anyone using btrfs send/receive for backups instead of rsync?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> In my case, I'm unable to reproduce the problem. I get the same sha256sum of an existing 16M journal file (in the read only snapshot) as I do in the send/received snapshot. The difference is the original is compromised of 1976 extents, while the received is in a single extent.

Was the send incremental? Did the files have actual changes? Did you
check more than one file?

I use rsync -cvan --delete "/.../${new}/" "/.../${new}/" to check the
full filesystem on every send (and sha1sum to confirm failures). Most
of the time at least one new file fails. My default time interval
between sends is about 16 days.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux