Re: Is anyone using btrfs send/receive for backups instead of rsync?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:07:58AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> For instance, if I use an existing rsync destination to start syncing
> btrfs snapshots to after that, and one file operation can't be applied
> because let's say the destination file it's supposed to be applied to,
> isn't there?

I should have written more: I'm guessing what happens is that the btrfs
receive fails/aborts, I get an error, I then run a manual rsync to reset
everything to a good known state, and then continue the btrfs
send/receive after that?

Marc
-- 
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/                         | PGP 1024R/763BE901
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux