Re: btrfs-progs integration branch versioning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 03:59:48PM +0000, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> It's not a big deal, but I've just noticed that the most recent
> unstable-integration btrfs tools (built from [1]) are still reporting
> their version as v0.20-rc1-638-g8e44385, rather than
> v3.12-xxx-xxxxxxxx. I believe this is because the master branch in the
> devel repository has not been tagged with the new version.
>
> The github clone/mirror(?) of the devel repository [2] has no tags for
> some reason, and the btrfs tools built from it report their version
> simply as v0.20-rc1 or v3.12 (depending on which branch you check
> out).

Sorry, I haven't pushed the tags, fixed now. The repos are mostly
identical to increase availability.

david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux