If no chunks need to be recovered, skip the recover works,
meanwhile the user won't be annoyed by the "ask_user".
Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
chunk-recover.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/chunk-recover.c b/chunk-recover.c
index ae0d318..45d6eae 100644
--- a/chunk-recover.c
+++ b/chunk-recover.c
@@ -1685,6 +1685,9 @@ int btrfs_recover_chunk_tree(char *path, int verbose, int yes)
* droppped from the fs. Don't deal with them now, we will
* check it after the fs is opened.
*/
+ } else {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Check chunks successfully with no orphans\n");
+ goto fail_rc;
}
root = open_ctree_with_broken_chunk(&rc);
--
1.8.0.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
