On 2013-11-14 22:22, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Instead if I use the btrfs-progs c652e4efb8e2dd7... I got >> >> [snip] > >> Data+Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=28.00KB >> >> Note the absence of any RAID1 profile. > > What happens if the devices are large enough to avoid mandatory block group mixing? Try 100GB for each device. Is the problem reproducible? It seems related to the mixing (see my other email). Even looking at the code and doing some tests seems to confirm that. > > Chris Murphy-- Goffredo -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
