On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:21 AM, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 06:20:16PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote: >> Good point David. However it would be a rather radical behaviour change imho. > > A radical step to prevent this practictly impossible but nasty bug to > happen :) > >> I think it should be a separate change if there are no objections >> against such change. > > It is a separate change that makes your patch obsolete. Except the part of making the hash value depend on both object id and root id, no? > > david -- Filipe David Manana, "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
