On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: > This test is motivated by an issue found by a btrfs user, addressed > and described by the following GNU/Linux kernel patch: Might be a little too nipicky, but there's no "GNU/Linux" kernel, it's just Linux. As for the test: thanks a lot for sending it a long here, but can you please create a new testcase for the specific inheritance bug instead of adding it to an existing test case? > # real QA test starts here > -_supported_fs xfs udf > +_supported_fs xfs udf btrfs Of course enabling the existing tests for btrfs is still fine (although it should be a second patch) > -chacl $acl3 largeaclfile > +if [ "$FSTYP" != "btrfs" ]; then > + chacl $acl3 largeaclfile > +else > + echo 'chacl: cannot set access acl on "largeaclfile": Invalid argument' > +fi Does btrfs support unlimited ACLs? If not we should test one above the limit here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
