preview as below..
Label: none uuid: 26d539a5-8968-4cf0-b4b5-5fd50105f8a0 mounted: /btrfs
Group profile: Metadata: single Metadata: DUP Data: single
It would look better if the profile types are grouped together,
As of now mkfs.btrfs and balance don't agree on the same set
of default group profiles. When we fix mkfs.btrfs (and for
now when user run balance) we won't see multiple profile for
Metadata/Data. So grouping them isn't needed, rather we should
fix mkfs and balance to be inline.
For now (in the FS which contains some data) after the balance
we won't see multiple group-profile for same group-type.
pls comment / let me know.
otherwise it can drift to the right quite far.
as of now do we practicality use/support multiple groups
for the same type (metadata/data), if not the content will
be always 6 words here (I am considering a system which is
balanced).
Why is Sytem not listed here?
System is not an user choice (?), So users won't be keen to
know at least in this high-level display. IMO.
Thanks, Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
