> So I _think_ we may need to truncate the ordered range in the inode as well, but > I haven't had a consistent reproducer for this case. I want to leave it like > this for now until I'm sure we don't need the truncate and then we could > probably just replace this with a test for FS_ERROR in finish_ordered_io. *nod*, added to the list :) - z -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
