On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:44:11 +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
[..]
>>> @@ -297,9 +305,10 @@ static int do_balance(const char *path, struct
>>> btrfs_ioctl_balance_args *args,
>>> DIR *dirstream = NULL;
>>>
>>> fd = open_file_or_dir(path, &dirstream);
>>> + e = errno;
>>> if (fd < 0) {
>>> fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: can't access to '%s'\n", path);
>>> - return 12;
>>> + return e;
Since I didn't understand whether you rejected or acknowledged Ilya's
comments, if you don't do so, please change the above line to "return
-e" like it is everywhere else: errno is returned as a negative value, 0
means no error, a positive value means the function failed but the
return value cannot be interpreted as an errno.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
