A disk_key was set by hand instead of using the endian helpers. I *think* the second one is just a typo. The chunk's num_stripes was already initialized from the record, but it's le16. So we'll set the item's size based on the record's native num_stripes. Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@xxxxxxxxxx> --- cmds-chunk.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/cmds-chunk.c b/cmds-chunk.c index 16f399e..54f0573 100644 --- a/cmds-chunk.c +++ b/cmds-chunk.c @@ -1031,9 +1031,9 @@ static int __rebuild_chunk_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (min_devid > dev->devid) min_devid = dev->devid; } - disk_key.objectid = BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID; - disk_key.type = BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY; - disk_key.offset = min_devid; + btrfs_set_disk_key_objectid(&disk_key, BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID); + btrfs_set_disk_key_type(&disk_key, BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY); + btrfs_set_disk_key_offset(&disk_key, min_devid); cow = btrfs_alloc_free_block(trans, root, root->sectorsize, BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID, @@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ static int __rebuild_chunk_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, key.offset = chunk_rec->offset; ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, chunk_root, &key, chunk, - btrfs_chunk_item_size(chunk->num_stripes)); + btrfs_chunk_item_size(chunk_rec->num_stripes)); free(chunk); if (ret) return ret; -- 1.7.11.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
