On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:48:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:02:07AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > This won't work, try having 10000 subvolumes with dirty inodes and do sync then > > go skiing, you'll have time :). Thanks, > > Why would the dirty inodes make any difference? If you share the bdi > between the subvolumes the sync workflow should be exactly the same > still. > If we could dis-entangle vfsmounts from sb's and have it so you could have multiple vfsmounts with just one sb that would solve at least the in-kernel confusion, but I think we still have the userspace confusion. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
